Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40663011›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2026

Calcific tendonitis of the shoulder; when should we operate?

T Berg, J M Bentley, N Saravanan, H Morris, A P Dekker, D I Clark

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

T BergUniversity of Nottingham, UK.
J M BentleyRoyal Derby Hospital, UK.
N SaravananRoyal Derby Hospital, UK.
H MorrisPulvertaft Hand Centre, Royal Derby Hospital, UK.
A P DekkerUniversity Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
D I ClarkRoyal Derby Hospital, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis study aimed to determine patient factors associated with the failure of nonoperative management of calcific tendonitis and subsequent operative intervention. The secondary aim was to assess whether the size of the calcific deposit can determine the need for surgery, as shown by previous studies in the literature.

methodsA retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database of a consecutive series of patients diagnosed with calcific tendonitis attending a single hospital trust orthopaedic department between 2014 and 2018 was performed. Data were collected on the size and location of the calcium deposit, comorbidities, Oxford Shoulder Score and functional range of movement.

resultsA total of 61 patients were included. Factors associated with the failure of nonoperative management were: size of calcific deposit >10mm (

conclusionsPatients with a calcific deposit larger than 10mm, who are female, or have had symptoms for more than eight months are more likely to require surgery. Those with a transient response to steroid injections and or physiotherapy are also more likely to require surgical management.

Indexed as

CalcinosisShoulder JointTendinopathyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRange of Motion, ArticularRetrospective StudiesSex FactorsTreatment FailureArthroscopyCalcificationCalcific tendonitisNonoperative managementShoulderSurgery

Identifiers

PMID40663011
PMCPMC13038365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.