Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40662897›Full record

ArticleWater science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research2025

Fingerprints of micropollutants under baseflow and event discharge conditions: analysing gradients along two urban streams.

Jakob Benisch, B Helm, M Krauss, H A Byrne, S Becker, R P Mayer, K L Rojas Gómez, J Ahlheim, W Brack, P Krebs

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jakob BenischTU Dresden, Department of Hydro Sciences, Institute for Urban Water Management, Dresden 01067, Germany E-mail: jakob.benisch@tu-dresden.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4782-6024
B HelmTU Dresden, Department of Hydro Sciences, Institute for Urban Water Management, Dresden 01067, Germany.
M KraussDepartment Exposure Science, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Leipzig 04318, Germany.
H A ByrneDepartment Exposure Science, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Leipzig 04318, Germany.
S BeckerTU Dresden, Department of Hydro Sciences, Institute for Urban Water Management, Dresden 01067, Germany.
R P MayerTU Dresden, Department of Hydro Sciences, Institute for Urban Water Management, Dresden 01067, Germany.
K L Rojas GómezTU Dresden, Department of Hydro Sciences, Institute for Urban Water Management, Dresden 01067, Germany.
J AhlheimDepartment Exposure Science, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Leipzig 04318, Germany.
W BrackDepartment Exposure Science, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ, Leipzig 04318, Germany.
P KrebsTU Dresden, Department of Hydro Sciences, Institute for Urban Water Management, Dresden 01067, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft KR 2337/17-1Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung Urbanes Wasserressourcenmanagement
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents the results from a monitoring campaign at two urban streams with multiple monitoring sites along an increased urban gradient, carried out in April to August 2022. The aim of the monitoring campaign was to identify pressures and sources of organic micropollutants using large-volume solid phase extraction. The campaign was using different sampling modes to distinguish between baseflow and evens. Samples were analysed for 735 compounds; the measured concentrations were aggregated for compound classes and related to discharge data. A source analysis showed different emission patterns for compound classes, using the correlation between concentration and discharges during baseflow. The number of detected compounds followed an increasing trend along the streams during baseflow and increased during events. The comparison between baseline samples and event samples showed that events cause a significant increase in the number of detected chemicals as well as in their concentration and relative loads. The event samples also yield higher ecological concerns based on a comparison of measured with effect concentrations (Toxic unit approach). We did not find correlations with different event characteristics (i.e. peak discharge, event duration, etc.). A high variability of compounds among the catchments and sampling sites within the catchments was evident.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringRiversWater Pollutants, ChemicalCitiesWater Pollutants, Chemicaldischarge eventslarge-volume solid phase extraction (LVSPE)micropollutantsrisk assessmentwater quality

Identifiers

PMID40662897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.