Trial reportInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025
Predictors of Final Visual Outcome in Patients With Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy Treated With Lenadogene Nolparvovec Gene Therapy.
Trial report in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Visual Neurorestoration: An Expert Review of Current Strategies for Restoring Vision in Humans.Brain sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This exploratory analysis aimed to identify predictive factors of final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in patients with Leber hereditary optic neuropathy (LHON) harboring the m.11778G>A mutation who received lenadogene nolparvovec gene therapy. Methods: The following covariates were individually evaluated as possible factors associated with improved final BCVA: age, gender, timing of treatment, baseline BCVA value, and baseline optical coherence tomography (OCT) parameters. Univariate analyses were performed from three phase 3 studies (RESCUE, REVERSE, and REFLECT), using BCVA at 1.5 years post-treatment as the dependent variable. Results: In 113 eyes treated at least 6 months after disease onset, the covariates statistically significantly associated with an improvement in final BCVA after having reached a nadir were thicker OCT measurements at baseline-specifically, outer segments of the macular ganglion cell layer (GCL) (superior, temporal, inferior, and nasal) and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) quadrants (superior, inferior, and nasal) (P < 0.05). The largest effects were observed in the thickness of the superior outer GCL segments at baseline (-0.28 logMAR; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.41 to -0.16) and temporal outer GCL segments at baseline (-0.26 logMAR; 95% CI, -0.38 to -0.13; both P <0.001). A better baseline BCVA in the dynamic phase of the disease was associated with a better final BCVA (-0.09 logMAR; 95% CI, -0.11 to -0.08; P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Better baseline BCVA values and baseline thicker GCL and RNFL at OCT measurements are key predictive factors of the improved BCVA 1.5 years after treatment in patients with MT-ND4 LHON who received lenadogene nolparvovec at least 6 months after disease onset.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.