Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40662859›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2025

The Design of Large-Scale Plasma Donation Trials.

Kecheng Li, Richard J Cook

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kecheng LiDepartment of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8950-4333
Richard J CookDepartment of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1414-4908

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2017-04207
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Devices for extracting blood from donors require rigorous evaluation for the safety of donors. Complications arise from the fact that outcomes on successive donations from the same donor are not independent, adverse event rates are extremely rare, and there is substantial heterogeneity in the propensity for donors to donate over time. We develop a statistical framework for the design of a superiority trial and a non-inferiority trial, aiming to demonstrate the safety of a new donation device compared to the standard one. Historical data on the intensity and heterogeneity of donation across donors, the adverse event rate, and the serial dependence in adverse events provide information on how to plan accrual and follow-up periods to give the expected number of donors and donations. The analysis is based on a binary donation-specific outcome modeled with a Poisson approximation (i.e., log link and identity variance function) using generalized estimating equations with a working independence assumption. The historical data enables calculation of the asymptotic robust variance estimate, which is used for planning. The formulae derived are found to provide good control of the type I error rate and statistical power. We illustrate the derivations with application to a plasma donation trial aiming to investigate the safety of a new device, with the outcome being serious hypotensive adverse events.

Indexed as

Blood DonorsResearch DesignBlood DonationComputer SimulationEquivalence Trials as TopicHumansModels, StatisticalPoisson Distributioncorrelated binary responsesgeneralized estimating equationheterogeneitynon‐inferiority trialrepeated measurementsrobust covarianceserial dependencesuperiority trial

Identifiers

PMID40662859
PMCPMC12261977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.