Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40662806›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025

Deep learning models for unbiased sequence-based PPI prediction plateau at an accuracy of 0.65.

Timo Reim, Anne Hartebrodt, David B Blumenthal, Judith Bernett, Markus List

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Rapid Proteome-Wide Discovery of Protein-Protein Interactions With ppIRIS.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Protein Language Models are Accidental Taxonomists.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Timo ReimData Science in Systems Biology, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, 85354, Germany.ORCID 0009-0002-7307-1347
Anne HartebrodtDepartment Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, 91052, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9172-3137
David B BlumenthalDepartment Artificial Intelligence in Biomedical Engineering, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, 91052, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8651-750X
Judith BernettData Science in Systems Biology, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, 85354, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5812-8013
Markus ListData Science in Systems Biology, TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, 85354, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0941-4168

Funding

Deutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftGerman Federal Ministry of Education and Research 031L0305AGerman Federal Ministry of Education and Research 031L0309AGerman Federal Ministry of Education and Research DROP2AIGerman Research Foundation 422216132Klaus Tschira Stiftung 00.003.2024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationAs most proteins interact with other proteins to perform their respective functions, methods to computationally predict these interactions have been developed. However, flawed evaluation schemes and data leakage in test sets have obscured the fact that sequence-based protein-protein interaction (PPI) prediction is still an open problem. Recently, methods achieving better-than-random performance on leakage-reduced PPI data have been proposed.

resultsHere, we show that the use of ESM-2 protein embeddings explains this performance gain irrespective of model architecture. We compared the performance of models with varying complexity, per-protein, and per-token embeddings, as well as the influence of self- or cross-attention, where all models plateaued at an accuracy of 0.65. Moreover, we show that the tested sequence-based models cannot implicitly learn a contact map as an intermediate layer. These results imply that other input types, such as structure, might be necessary for producing reliable PPI predictions. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: All code for models and execution of the models is available at https://github.com/daisybio/PPI_prediction_study. Python version 3.8.18 and PyTorch version 2.1.1 were used for this study. The environment containing the versions of all other packages used can be found in the GitHub repository. The used data are available at https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21591618.v3.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyDeep LearningProtein Interaction MappingProteinsSequence Analysis, ProteinAlgorithmsDatabases, ProteinProteins

Identifiers

PMID40662806
PMCPMC12261406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.