Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40662786›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2025

Iterative attack-and-defend framework for improving TCR-epitope binding prediction models.

Pengfei Zhang, Hao Mei, Seojin Bang, Heewook Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pengfei ZhangSchool of Computing and Augmented Intelligence, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, United States.
Hao MeiSchool of Computing and Augmented Intelligence, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, United States.
Seojin BangGoogle DeepMind, Mountain View, CA 94043, United States.
Heewook LeeSchool of Computing and Augmented Intelligence, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, United States.

Funding

Machine Learning Models for Studying Protein Interactions in the Context of Immune ReceptorsR35GM155417 · NIGMS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI Heewook Lee · 2024 to 2026
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM155417NIH HHS R35GM155417
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationReliable TCR-epitope binding prediction models are essential for development of adoptive T cell therapy and vaccine design. These models often struggle with false positives, which can be attributed to the limited data coverage in existing negative sample datasets. Common strategies for generating negative samples, such as pairing with background T cell receptors (TCRs) or shuffling within pairs, fail to account for model-specific vulnerabilities or biologically implausible sequences.

resultsTo address these challenges, we propose an iterative attack-and-defend framework that systematically identifies and mitigates weaknesses in TCR-epitope prediction models. During the attack phase, a reinforcement learning from AI feedback (RLAIF) framework is used to attack a prediction model by generating biologically implausible sequences that can easily deceive the model. During the defense phase, these identified false positives are incorporated into fine-tuning dataset, enhancing the model's ability to detect false positives. A comprehensive adversarial negative dataset can be obtained by iteratively attacking and defending the model. This dataset can be directly used to improve model robustness, eliminating the need for users to conduct their own attack-and-defend cycles. We apply our framework to five existing binding prediction models, spanning diverse architectures and embedding strategies to show its efficacy. Experimental results show that our approach significantly improves these models' ability to detect adversarial false positives. The combined dataset constructed from these experiments also provides a benchmarking tool to evaluate and refine prediction models. Our framework offers a new approach for improving model robustness in other biological tasks where negative sampling is inherently limited. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The curated dataset and code are available at a public repository (https://github.com/Lee-CBG/BAP_Attack_n_Defend).

Indexed as

Computational BiologyEpitopes, T-LymphocyteReceptors, Antigen, T-CellAlgorithmsHumansProtein BindingEpitopes, T-LymphocyteReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell

Identifiers

PMID40662786
PMCPMC12261473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.