ArticleStatistics in medicine2025
Simultaneous Feature Selection for Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimens.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Simultaneous Feature Selection for Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimens.Statistics in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dynamic treatment regimens (DTRs), where treatment decisions are tailored to individual patient's characteristics and evolving health status over multiple stages, have gained increasing interest in the modern era of precision medicine. Identifying important features that drive these decisions over stages not only leads to parsimonious DTRs for practical use but also enhances the reliability of learning optimal DTRs. Existing methods for learning optimal DTRs, such as Q-learning and O-learning, rely on a sequential procedure to estimate the optimal decision at each stage backward. Incorporating feature selection in these methods through regularization at each stage of estimation only identifies unimportant tailoring variables at each stage but is not necessary for those variables that are not important across all the stages. As a result, false discovery errors are likely to accumulate over stages in these sequential methods. To overcome this limitation, we propose a framework, namely L1 multistage ramp loss (L1-MRL) learning, to learn the optimal decision rules and, at the same time, perform variable selection across all the stages simultaneously. This framework uses a single multistage ramp loss to estimate optimal DTRs for all stages. Furthermore, a group Lasso-type penalty is imposed to penalize the coefficients in the decision rules across all stages, which enables the identification of features that are important for at least one stage decision. Theoretically, we show that the estimator is consistent and enjoys the oracle property toward the optimal. We demonstrate that the proposed method performs equally well as or better than many existing DTR methods with variable selection capability via extensive simulation studies and an application to electronic health record (EHR) data for type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.