ArticleBJS open2025
Management of bilioenteric anastomosis leakage after major liver resection.
Article in BJS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPost-hepatectomy bile leakage is a challenging issue that can lead to morbidities and mortality after liver resection. This leakage can occur either from a bilioenteric anastomosis (BEA) or from the transected surface of the liver. This study investigated the incidence, risk factors, and effective management of BEA leakage after major liver resection.
methodsBile leakage was diagnosed through drain fluid analysis based on the International Study Group of Liver Surgery definition. Leakage from a BEA was confirmed via fluoroscopy during percutaneous interventions or reoperation. Perioperative data and data on the management of patients with BEA leakage were collected and analysed. Bivariate analysis used Mann-Whitney U and χ2 tests, and binary logistic regression identified risk factors for BEA leakage, with variables having P < 0.200 included in multivariable analysis.
resultsOf 2936 patients undergoing hepatectomy between 2008 and 2023, 229 underwent liver resection with BEA. Leakage from the BEA was identified in 44 patients (19.2%). These patients had a higher rate of post-hepatectomy haemorrhage (P = 0.005), major complications (P = 0.001), BEA stenosis (P = 0.006), and mortality (P = 0.043). The success rate of the management of BEA leakage was 70% for reoperation and 58% for percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography and drainage (PTCD).
conclusionBEA leakage after major liver resection is a severe complication associated with higher morbidity and mortality rates. Surgical treatment appeared to be more successful than PTCD in the early postoperative phase. PTCD proved to be a valuable additional therapy option following reoperation. These conclusions should be taken with caution and need to be confirmed through further prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.