Trial reportBJS open2025
Comparison of catheter wound infusion, intrathecal morphine, and intravenous analgesia for postoperative pain management in open liver resection: randomized clinical trial.
Trial report in BJS open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03238430 (Management of Pain Post Hepatectomy), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Management of Pain Post Hepatectomy : Infiltration of Local Anesthetics Versus Continuous Spinal Analgesia .
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Early postoperative pain and opioid use after liver surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPain relief is an important aspect of recovery after open liver resection. This randomized open-label single-centre trial assessed the efficacy of intravenous (i.v.) analgesia alone or in combination with catheter wound infusion (CWI) or intrathecal morphine (ITM) after open liver resection.
methodsAdult patients undergoing open liver resection were randomly assigned to receive either i.v. analgesia alone or in combination with ITM or CWI. In this study, i.v. analgesia consisted of systematic i.v. paracetamol and i.v. morphine via a patient-controlled analgesia pump, with i.v. nefopam as rescue analgesia for a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score > 4. The primary outcome was cumulative morphine dose at 24 hours (h). Secondary outcomes included pain intensity, cumulative opioid use at 48 and 72 h, and postoperative complications.
resultsIn all, 186 patients were included in the study (62 patients in each group). The median 24-h morphine dose was 14 (interquartile range (i.q.r.) 6-25) mg in the i.v. analgesia group, 14 (i.q.r. 7-23) mg in the CWI group, and 7 (i.q.r. 3-15) mg in the ITM group. ITM significantly reduced morphine use compared with i.v. analgesia alone (mean difference on log-transformed values 0.57; 95% confidence interval 0.21 to 0.93; Bonferroni-adjusted P = 0.002) and lowered pain scores during the first 12 h. No significant differences were observed between the CWI and i.v. analgesia groups. By 72 h, cumulative opioid use was similar across all groups. Adverse events and postoperative complications were comparable across the three groups.
conclusionITM reduced the cumulative morphine dose and pain intensity in the first 24 h after liver resection, providing a valuable option for postoperative analgesia. REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03238430 (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.