ArticleHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics2025
Adverse events following 9-valent human papillomavirus vaccine (GARDASIL® 9) reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), 2015-2024.
Article in Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Pocket Manual for Human Papillomavirus Vaccines.Vaccines · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
GARDASIL 9, a 9-valent HPV vaccine approved in 2014, is widely administered for the prevention of HPV-related malignancies. Although clinical trials demonstrated a favorable safety profile, rare or delayed-onset adverse events may not be captured pre-licensure. Post-marketing surveillance using VAERS offers a complementary approach for signal detection and safety monitoring. We conducted a retrospective pharmacovigilance analysis of VAERS reports following GARDASIL 9 administration from January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2024. Adverse events were encoded using MedDRA v26.0 and categorized by System Organ Class. Disproportionality analyses using four independent algorithms (ROR, PRR, IC, EBGM) were applied to identify positive safety signals. Subgroup assessments included serious reports, death reports, and reports in pregnant individuals. Among reported events, most were non-serious and consistent with known reactogenicity patterns, including syncope, headache, and injection site reactions. However, signals were also detected for certain events not listed in product labeling, including postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, eye movement disorder, autoimmune thyroiditis, and posture abnormality. In 57 death reports, neurological terms showed signal elevation but lacked consistent etiologic patterns. No positive signals were detected in the 18 pregnancy-associated reports. This VAERS-based analysis supports the established safety of GARDASIL 9 while highlighting rare signals that warrant further investigation. Given the limitations of passive surveillance, integration with active monitoring systems is essential to refine safety profiles and support ongoing public health vaccination efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.