Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40662648›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2025

Sample Size Calculations for Partially Clustered Trials.

Kylie M Lange, Jessica Kasza, Thomas R Sullivan, Lisa N Yelland

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kylie M LangeSchool of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3814-8513
Jessica KaszaSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8940-0136
Thomas R SullivanSchool of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Lisa N YellandSchool of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3803-8728

Funding

Australian GovernmentNational Health and Medical Research Council 1171422National Health and Medical Research Council 1173576
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Partially clustered trials are defined as trials where some observations belong to a cluster and others are independent. For example, neonatal trials may include infants from a single, twin, or triplet birth. The clustering of observations in partially clustered trials should be accounted for when determining the target sample size to avoid being over or underpowered. However, sample size methods have only been developed for limited partially clustered trial designs (e.g., designs with maximum cluster sizes of 2). In this article, we present new design effects that can be used to determine the sample size for two-arm, parallel, partially clustered trials where clusters exist pre-randomization. Design effects are derived algebraically for continuous and binary outcomes, assuming a generalized estimating equations-based approach to estimation with either an independence or exchangeable working correlation structure. Both cluster and individual randomization are considered for the clustered observations. The design effects are shown to depend on the intracluster correlation coefficient, proportion of observations that belong to clusters of each size, method of randomization, type of outcome, and working correlation structure. The design effects are validated through a simulation study. Example sample size calculations are presented to illustrate how the design effects can be used to determine the target sample size for different partially clustered trial designs. The design effects depend on parameters that can be feasibly estimated when planning a trial and can be used to ensure that partially clustered trials are appropriately powered in the future.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCluster AnalysisComputer SimulationHumansInfant, NewbornModels, StatisticalResearch DesignSample Sizeclustered datageneralized estimating equationspowerre‐randomization designsample sizetrial design

Identifiers

PMID40662648
PMCPMC12261973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.