ReviewEuropean heart journal2025
Artificial intelligence in cardiovascular pharmacotherapy: applications and perspectives.
Review in European heart journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic Review of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Clinical Trials for Central Nervous System Injuries.Current neuropharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Hyperkalemia risk with finerenone in diabetic kidney disease: a real-world analysis from the FINE-TURK cohort.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Article
- An interpretable early intensive care unit model for predicting in-hospital mortality in trauma patients combined with rib fractures: development and external validation.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- The effects of multitype prompt engineering for large language models in hypertension treatment decisions.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Advances in the Diagnosis and Management of High-Risk Cardiovascular Conditions: Biomarkers, Intracoronary Imaging, Artificial Intelligence, and Novel Anticoagulants.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2026Review
- Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Feature Reviews in Cardiovascular Diseases.Biomedicines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have shown great potential in improving cardiovascular pharmacotherapy by optimizing drug selection, predicting therapeutic efficacy and adverse effects, ultimately improving patient outcomes. Leveraging techniques like machine learning and in silico modelling, AI can identify populations likely to benefit from specific treatments, expedite novel drug discovery and reduce costs. Computational methods can also facilitate the detection of drug interactions and tailor interventions based on real-world data, supporting personalized care. Artificial intelligence-based approaches also show promise in streamlining clinical trial design and execution, leveraging on real-time data on patient responsiveness, enhancing recruitment efficiency. However, in order to fully realize these benefits, robust validation across diverse patient populations is necessary to ensure accuracy and generalizability. In addition, addressing concerns regarding data quality, privacy, and bias is equally critical to avoid exacerbating existing healthcare disparities. Scientific societies and regulatory agencies must ultimately establish standardized frameworks for data management, model certification, and transparency, to enable safe and effective integration of AI into clinical practice. This manuscript aims at systematically reviewing the current state-of-the-art applications of AI in cardiovascular pharmacotherapy, describing their current potential in guiding treatment decisions, refine trial methodologies and support drug discovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.