Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40662525›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2025

Transfer Learning for Error-Contaminated Poisson Regression Models.

Jou-Chin Wu, Li-Pang Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jou-Chin WuDepartment of Statistics, National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.
Li-Pang ChenDepartment of Statistics, National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5440-5036

Funding

National Science and Technology Council 112-2118-M-004-005-MY2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poisson regression model has been a popular approach to characterize the count response and the covariates. With the rapid development of data collections, the additional source information can be easily recorded. To efficiently use the source data to improve the estimation under the original data, the transfer learning method is considered a strategy. However, challenging issues from the given datasets include measurement error and high-dimensionality in variables, which are not well explored in the context of transfer learning. In this paper, we propose a novel strategy to handle error-prone count responses and estimate the parameters in measurement error models by using the source data, and then employ the transfer learning method to derive the corrected estimator. Moreover, to improve the prediction and avoid the model uncertainty, we further establish the model averaging strategy. Simulation and breast cancer data studies verify the satisfactory performance of the proposed method and the validity of handling measurement error.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalBreast NeoplasmsComputer SimulationData Interpretation, StatisticalFemaleHumansPoisson DistributionRegression Analysiserror‐prone count variablesmodel averagingpredictionvariable selection

Identifiers

PMID40662525
PMCPMC12333914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.