Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40662505›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2025

MARGO: Machine Learning-Assisted Adaptive Randomization for Group Sequential Trials Based on Overlap Weights.

Yeonhee Park, Samuel Nycklemoe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yeonhee ParkDepartment of Statistics, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9645-3407
Samuel NycklemoeDepartment of Biostatistics and Medical Informatics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adaptive randomization is a promising approach in clinical trials that aims to optimize patient outcomes by adjusting treatment allocation probabilities based on accumulating data. However, implementing adaptive randomization in group sequential trials, which include interim analyses for early stopping decisions, poses significant challenges, such as managing type I error inflation and ensuring robust statistical validity. This paper proposes Machine learning-assisted Adaptive Randomization for Group sequential trials based on Overlap weights (MARGO) as an innovative solution to these challenges. MARGO integrates machine learning (ML) models into the adaptive randomization process, allowing dynamic updates to randomization probabilities based on real-time predictions of treatment success. To control the overall type I error rate due to the covariate imbalance in group sequential trials, MARGO utilizes overlap weights (OW), which are employed to balance covariates across treatment groups, minimizing confounding and ensuring that the comparison between treatments remains unbiased. In our implementation, various ML algorithms are evaluated for their effectiveness in predicting treatment outcomes. Through extensive simulation studies, we demonstrate that MARGO not only enhances the flexibility and efficiency of group sequential trials but also maintains statistical rigor by effectively controlling type I error rates. Our results show that MARGO provides a more ethical and data-driven approach to patient allocation, potentially improving treatment success rates while preserving the integrity of the trial.

Indexed as

Machine LearningRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAlgorithmsComputer SimulationHumansModels, StatisticalRandom Allocationclinical trialsdynamic predictionpersonalized medicinepropensity score method

Identifiers

PMID40662505
PMCPMC12261390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.