Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40662474›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie2026

Multi-Breed Genomic Predictions for Average Daily Gain in Three Italian Beef Cattle Breeds.

Daniele Colombi, Renzo Bonifazi, Fiorella Sbarra, Andrea Quaglia, Mario P L Calus, Emiliano Lasagna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Better Multi-Breed Genomic Predictions for Tropical Bull Fertility Using a Breed-Adjusted Genomic Relationship Matrix.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Daniele ColombiDipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Alimentari e Ambientali, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5167-0459
Renzo BonifaziAnimal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1794-4708
Fiorella SbarraAssociazione Nazionale Allevatori Bovini Italiani da Carne (ANABIC), Perugia, Italy.
Andrea QuagliaAssociazione Nazionale Allevatori Bovini Italiani da Carne (ANABIC), Perugia, Italy.
Mario P L CalusAnimal Breeding and Genomics, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, the Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3213-704X
Emiliano LasagnaDipartimento di Scienze Agrarie, Alimentari e Ambientali, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2725-2921

Funding

"Italian Biodiversity Environment Efficiency Fitness"- I-BEEF 1 and 2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Marchigiana, Chianina, and Romagnola are three Italian autochthonous beef cattle breeds that have been historically selected for meat production. Recent advancements suggest that the use of genomic data and multi-breed (MB) models to combine information from different breeds may help to increase the accuracies of genomic predictions, in particular if the available data per breed is limited. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the accuracies of genomic predictions for average daily gain (ADG) in the three Italian breeds. We implemented different scenarios using phenotypes collected on 5303 young bulls in performance tests across the three breeds, 23,793 pedigree records, and 4593 genotypes, and then validated through the linear regression method. The implemented scenarios were: pedigree Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (pBLUP) and single-step Genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) single-trait single-breed evaluations where each breed was modelled separately; pBLUP and ssGBLUP single-trait multi-breed evaluations where ADG was modelled as the same trait for all breeds, and ssGBLUP multi-trait multi-breed evaluations where ADG was considered as a different correlated trait across breeds. In addition, single- and multi-breed pBLUP and ssGBLUP evaluations were implemented including weight at 1 year of age and muscularity as correlated traits of ADG in a multi-trait approach. Results highlighted the improved accuracies (an average of 5% in ssGBLUP models compared to corresponding pBLUP ones) when incorporating genomic data in the prediction models. Moreover, single-trait multi-breed scenarios resulted in higher accuracy for breeds with lower heritabilities for ADG (an average of 4% for single-trait multi-breed models compared to single-breed ones), confirming the importance of leveraging data from populations with higher heritabilities. Lastly, adding two correlated traits next to ADG in the single- and multi-breed ssGBLUP yielded even higher accuracies than the scenarios only encompassing ADG. The observed increases in accuracy when leveraging data from more populations and/or more traits could be helpful when implementing genomic predictions for innovative traits with limited records per individual or low heritabilities, and for the genetic improvement of local populations where limited data availability represents a challenge for traditional genetic selection.

Indexed as

BreedingGenomicsAnimalsCattleGenomeGenotypeItalyMaleModels, GeneticPedigreePhenotypegenomic selectionlinear regression validationlocal breedsmulti‐traitssGBLUP

Identifiers

PMID40662474
PMCPMC12686752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.