ArticleJournal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie2026
Multi-Breed Genomic Predictions for Average Daily Gain in Three Italian Beef Cattle Breeds.
Article in Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Better Multi-Breed Genomic Predictions for Tropical Bull Fertility Using a Breed-Adjusted Genomic Relationship Matrix.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2026Article
- Improving multibreed genomic prediction for breeds with small populations by modeling heterogeneous genetic (co)variance blockwise accounting for linkage disequilibrium.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Marchigiana, Chianina, and Romagnola are three Italian autochthonous beef cattle breeds that have been historically selected for meat production. Recent advancements suggest that the use of genomic data and multi-breed (MB) models to combine information from different breeds may help to increase the accuracies of genomic predictions, in particular if the available data per breed is limited. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the accuracies of genomic predictions for average daily gain (ADG) in the three Italian breeds. We implemented different scenarios using phenotypes collected on 5303 young bulls in performance tests across the three breeds, 23,793 pedigree records, and 4593 genotypes, and then validated through the linear regression method. The implemented scenarios were: pedigree Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (pBLUP) and single-step Genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) single-trait single-breed evaluations where each breed was modelled separately; pBLUP and ssGBLUP single-trait multi-breed evaluations where ADG was modelled as the same trait for all breeds, and ssGBLUP multi-trait multi-breed evaluations where ADG was considered as a different correlated trait across breeds. In addition, single- and multi-breed pBLUP and ssGBLUP evaluations were implemented including weight at 1 year of age and muscularity as correlated traits of ADG in a multi-trait approach. Results highlighted the improved accuracies (an average of 5% in ssGBLUP models compared to corresponding pBLUP ones) when incorporating genomic data in the prediction models. Moreover, single-trait multi-breed scenarios resulted in higher accuracy for breeds with lower heritabilities for ADG (an average of 4% for single-trait multi-breed models compared to single-breed ones), confirming the importance of leveraging data from populations with higher heritabilities. Lastly, adding two correlated traits next to ADG in the single- and multi-breed ssGBLUP yielded even higher accuracies than the scenarios only encompassing ADG. The observed increases in accuracy when leveraging data from more populations and/or more traits could be helpful when implementing genomic predictions for innovative traits with limited records per individual or low heritabilities, and for the genetic improvement of local populations where limited data availability represents a challenge for traditional genetic selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.