Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40662372›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of clinical investigation2025

Early neoplastic lesions of the pancreas: initiation, progression, and opportunities for precancer interception.

Brian A Pedro, Laura D Wood

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of clinical investigation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. GATA4 loss promotes mutantbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  9. KRAS Inhibitors in Pancreas Cancer: Facts and Hopes about the Immunotherapy We Have All Been Waiting for.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Current issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: the Everest of cancer biology.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brian A PedroDepartment of Pathology, and.
Laura D WoodDepartment of Pathology, and.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is known to progress from one of two main precursor lesions: pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN) or intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN). The poor survival rates for patients with PDAC, even those diagnosed with localized disease, highlight the need for pancreatic cancer interception at the precursor stage. Although their basic biological drivers are well characterized, practical strategies for PanIN and IPMN interception remain elusive due to difficulties with detection, risk stratification, and low-morbidity intervention. Recently, advances in liquid biopsy, spatial multiomics analysis, and machine learning technology have provided deeper understanding of the molecular landscapes underlying pancreatic precursor development and progression. In this Review, we outline the different histologic phenotypes, clinical characteristics, and neoplastic cell-intrinsic and -extrinsic drivers of PanINs and IPMNs, with particular focus on current and potential future opportunities for pancreatic precancer interception.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalPancreatic Intraductal NeoplasmsPancreatic NeoplasmsPrecancerous ConditionsDisease ProgressionHumans

Identifiers

PMID40662372
PMCPMC12259249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.