ArticleGenetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics2025
Toward an integrated resource for pharmacogenomics (PGx): Survey findings from the genomic medicine communities.
Article in Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- From evidence to implementation: key priorities for pharmacogenomics-guided treatment and prevention from a European expert workshop.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Pharmacogenetic testing in Italy: results of a nationwide survey by the Joint Working Group for the pharmacogenetics implementation in Italy.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Impact of Complex Genetic and Drug-Drug Interactions on Tamoxifen Metabolism and Efficacy.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposePharmacogenomics (PGx) is a critical component of precision health care that aims to improve drug efficacy and reduce adverse events. Terminologies and standards have not always aligned between PGx and broader genomic medicine communities, which is a barrier to PGx implementation. An updated assessment of community barriers, needs, and perspectives is critical to enable more standardized terminologies and interpretation frameworks.
methodsThe Clinical Genome Resource's PGx Interpretation Committee (PGxIC, formerly referred to as the PGx Working Group, PGxWG) conducted 2 surveys targeting the PGx and genomic medicine communities (n = 508) to evaluate perspectives on PGx clinical validity and actionability frameworks, as well as other barriers to PGx implementation. Surveys were tailored toward self-reported familiarity with PGx. Data primarily consisted of free text, which were analyzed using qualitative content analysis methods.
resultsSurvey responses indicated conflation of terminology across disciplines, including confusion around differing definitions of terms in PGx and non-PGx contexts. Data also indicated broad support for leveraging existing PGx guidelines and framework structures alongside the standardization of approaches and centralization of resources.
conclusionThese novel survey results demonstrate broad consensus on the importance of integrating PGx into clinical practice, including support for development of gene-drug response clinical validity and actionability frameworks aligned with Clinical Genome Resource's frameworks for gene-disease relationships.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.