ArticleMalaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia2025
Development and validation of the Tuberculosis Diabetes Mellitus-Predictive Tool (TBDM-PT) in primary care.
Article in Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Tuberculosis (TB) is a major public health issue worldwide. Screening patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) for TB incurs the highest cost per TB case discovered. Thus, a more practical and useful screening tool is required, especially at the primary care level. This study sought to develop and validate the Tuberculosis Diabetes Mellitus-Predictive Tool (TBDM-PT) in Kelantan, Malaysia. Methods: This study included 270 patients with DM (with and without TB) from 2019 to 2021 at health clinics in Kelantan. The variables included in the risk score were chosen using logistic regression analysis. Receiver-operating characteristic curves were used to define the cut-off points for scores indicating a low or high risk of developing TB. Nine experts and 20 healthcare workers were involved in the content and face validation processes, respectively. Results: The risk score was created using eight different variables. The cut-off point selected was 11 out of 21, with sensitivity and specificity of 81% and 90%, respectively. The content validity index of the scale was 0.93, while the face validity index of each component varied from 0.95 to 1.00. Conclusion: The newly developed TBDM-PT has great potential as a screening tool for TB among patients with DM at the primary care level. External validation and evaluation of this tool in diverse settings and larger populations are required before being applied into standard diabetes care pathways in primary care facilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.