ArticleJOR spine2025
Demographic and Biomedical Characteristics of an Observational Cohort With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Descriptive Analysis.
Article in JOR spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- 4-Week Comparative Outcomes of Standard Physiotherapy, Balneotherapy Plus Physiotherapy and Dextrose Prolotherapy in Patients with Low Back Pain: A Non-Randomized Study.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Trial
- In-Field Ecological Momentary Assessment From Wearable Motion Sensors and Self-Report in a Chronic Low Back Pain Cohort.JOR spine · 2026Article
- Lumbopelvic Kinematics During Functional Tasks in a Chronic Low Back Pain Observational Cohort.JOR spine · 2025Article
- Quantitative Sensory Testing in an Observational Cohort of Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain.JOR spine · 2025Article
- Patient-Reported Outcomes Among an Observational Cohort of Individuals With Chronic Low Back Pain.JOR spine · 2025Article
- Demographic and Biomedical Characteristics of an Observational Cohort With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Descriptive Analysis.JOR spine · 2025Article
- Feasibility of Physical Exam and Performance-Based Tests in Individuals With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Descriptive Study.JOR spine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The chronic low back pain (cLBP) literature rarely includes comprehensive characterization of demographic and biomedical factors in a large sample of individuals. The University of Pittsburgh Mechanistic Research Center, entitled, "Low Back Pain: Biological, Biomechanical, Behavioral Phenotypes (LB Methods: The key eligibility criteria were adults with cLBP, English speakers, and identified in the electronic health record of our medical center. Recruitment strategies were through clinical partners who invited their patients to join the study and research registries. Participants completed demographic and biomedical surveys. Descriptive statistics were computed for the sample overall, and for the subgroups (male/female and age < 60/≥ 60). Results: Conclusions: Describing comprehensive demographic and biomedical characteristics of individuals with cLBP stratified by sex and age will serve as a reference for clinicians and research planning, particularly with respect to comorbid conditions and utilization of treatment for cLBP. These data will be useful in future efforts to comprehensively phenotype cLBP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.