Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40662111›Full record

ArticleJOR spine2025

Impact of Habitual Flexion on Bone Formation After Spinal Fusion Surgery: An In Silico Study.

Siddarth Ananth Swaminathan, Nima Taheri, Luis Becker, Matthias Pumberger, Hendrik Schmidt, Sara Checa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JOR spine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Siddarth Ananth SwaminathanJulius Wolff Institute Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4150-5680
Nima TaheriCenter for Musculoskeletal Surgery Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany.
Luis BeckerCenter for Musculoskeletal Surgery Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany.
Matthias PumbergerCenter for Musculoskeletal Surgery Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany.
Hendrik SchmidtJulius Wolff Institute Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany.
Sara ChecaJulius Wolff Institute Berlin Institute of Health, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lumbar spinal fusion is currently regarded as one of the most effective surgical treatments for patients with spinal deformities, degenerative disc disease, and degenerative spondylolisthesis. However, the procedure still faces a high incidence of non-unions. A key factor contributing to non-union is stress shielding effects related to unfavorable mechanical signals at the fusion site. Mechanical conditions at the fusion site are determined by the loading conditions that result from daily activities. Recent studies have reported that humans spend most of the day with their spine in a flexed position. The role of flexion loading in the progression of bone fusion remains poorly understood. This study explores the influence of habitual flexion loading on the spinal fusion process using a computational modeling framework that integrates finite element analysis with bone healing algorithms to simulate bone regeneration following fusion surgery. Methods: A finite element model of the lumbar spine based on a healthy subject was developed and validated with in vitro experimental data. Thereafter, a virtual posterior lumbar interbody fusion was performed where 2 intervertebral cages were inserted at the L4-L5 level together with posterior fixation. The influence of two loading conditions on the predicted fusion process were investigated: (1) A compression load (2) A hybrid (compression + flexion) loading protocol simulating habitual flexion encountered during daily living. Results: Bone bridging was predicted to occur 14 weeks after surgery. At week 14, for the hybrid loading, the model predicted a bone volume of 70%, whereas for compression load, the bone volume prediction was 59%. Computer model predictions showed that habitual flexion loading can promote bone formation in the anterior and peripheral regions by inducing a mechanical environment favorable for bone formation. Conclusion: Flexion loading may enhance bone healing by promoting mechanically advantageous conditions. The computational framework could guide the development of optimized rehabilitation protocols to improve fusion outcomes.

Indexed as

bone healingfinite element methodlumbar spinespinal fusion

Identifiers

PMID40662111
PMCPMC12258091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.