ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
The influence of high myopia-related exotropia on surgical dose-response in unilateral recession and resection surgery: a retrospective study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Anterior horizontal rectus anatomy in children with concomitant strabismus.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Risk Factors of Residual Exotropia After Surgery in Patients with Intermittent and Sensory Exotropia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the impact of high myopia on the surgical dose-response in unilateral recession and resection (R&R) surgery for exotropia. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 101 Chinese patients who underwent unilateral R&R surgery for concomitant exotropia between June 2021 and June 2024. Patients were divided into two groups based on axial length: those with high myopia ( Results: Age, duration of exotropia, and AL differed significantly between the groups, but other baseline characteristics were comparable. The LR recession dose did not differ significantly between the high myopia group (6.40 ± 1.11 mm) and the non-high myopia group (6.74 ± 1.00 mm, Conclusion: Exotropia with high myopia had a greater surgical dose response than those without high myopia. No significant difference was found in LR recession dose, but the MR resection dose was significantly lower in the high myopia group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.