Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40662061›Full record

ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2025

A Cross-Sectional Study on the Impact of Nurse-Led Health Coaching on Oncology Patient Outcomes.

Mohammed Almutairi, Ashwaq A Almutairi, Abdulaziz M Alodhialah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Genotoxicity of cancer therapies and the risk of secondary malignancies: toward personalized prevention.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2026
    Article
  5. Scoping review of oncology clinical trials nursing: Roles, competencies, and evolving practice in cancer research.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mohammed AlmutairiDepartment of Medical-Surgical Nursing, College of Nursing, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-0530-8218
Ashwaq A AlmutairiSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Abdulaziz M AlodhialahDepartment of Medical-Surgical Nursing, College of Nursing, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0009-0002-1643-2599

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Nurse-led health coaching is a promising intervention in oncology care aimed at improving patient-centered outcomes such as self-efficacy, symptom management, and adherence. This study investigates the association between the frequency of health coaching sessions and key clinical and psychosocial outcomes among cancer patients undergoing active treatment. Objective: To explore the impact of nurse-led health coaching on self-efficacy, symptom severity, adherence, shared decision-making, and emotional well-being in oncology patients, with outcomes assessed immediately after coaching sessions. Methods: A cross-sectional, correlational study was conducted with 326 adult cancer patients receiving outpatient treatment at comprehensive cancer centers. Eligible participants had completed at least two health coaching sessions within the previous three months. Data were collected using validated tools, including the PROMIS Global-10 for symptom severity, the Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease 6-Item Scale, and the CollaboRATE shared decision-making measure. All outcomes were assessed immediately after a coaching session to ensure accurate reflection of patients' experiences. Logistic regression analysis examined the relationships between coaching frequency and outcomes, adjusting for demographic and clinical factors. Results: Patients who attended five or more health coaching sessions had significantly greater odds of achieving high self-efficacy (OR = 2.68, 95% CI: 1.75-4.11), low symptom severity (OR = 2.14, 95% CI: 1.41-3.23), and high adherence (OR = 2.89, 95% CI: 1.82-4.58). Additionally, frequent coaching was strongly associated with improved shared decision-making (OR = 3.45, 95% CI: 2.21-5.38) and emotional well-being (OR = 3.12, 95% CI: 2.00-4.87). Coaching also significantly reduced fatigue and pain levels. Conclusion: Frequent nurse-led health coaching significantly improves both clinical and psychosocial outcomes in oncology patients. These findings emphasize the importance of integrating structured coaching interventions into routine cancer care.

Indexed as

health coachingoncology nursingself-efficacyshared decision-makingsymptom managementtreatment adherence

Identifiers

PMID40662061
PMCPMC12258200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.