ArticleExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2025
Assessment of patient perception and administration technique of vaginal tablets at a tertiary care women's hospital.
Article in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Vaginal tablets offer an effective and patient-friendly route for both localized and systemic therapies, bypassing hepatic first-pass metabolism and minimizing gastrointestinal side effects. However, in low-resource settings like Nepal, their optimal use is often hindered by patient's perception and administration techniques. Objective: This study aimed to assess patient perception and administration technique of vaginal tablets at a tertiary women's hospital in Nepal. Methods: A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted from February to July 2024 among 117 women of reproductive age visiting a tertiary care women's hospital in Kathmandu. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews using a validated 8-item perception questionnaire and an 8-item administration technique checklist. Bivariate analysis using Pearson's chi-square test and binary logistic regression were performed to identify factors associated with patients' perceptions and administration techniques. Results: More than half (56.4 %) of the patient's demonstrated adequate administration techniques (scores ≥6), yet a striking 76.1 % exhibited suboptimal perceptions towards vaginal tablet use. Factors such as being unmarried, having lower educational attainment (illiterate or school level education), being unemployed or a housemaker, residing in rural areas, and lacking prior experience were significantly associated with poorer perceptions. Notably, younger age, prior use and counseling by pharmacists were positively linked to better administration techniques. Conclusion: Despite adequate administration practices among most women, suboptimal perceptions persist, influenced by demographic and experiential factors. Tailored, provider-led educational interventions focusing on counseling and user-friendly instructions are essential to enhance patient understanding, comfort, and adherence, thereby improving therapeutic outcomes and empowering women in their reproductive health decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.