ArticleCureus2025
Facial Pilomatrixoma in a Child: A Rare Differential for a Soft Tissue Lesion.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pilomatrixoma is an uncommon benign skin tumor originating from hair matrix cells, most frequently observed in children. Due to its slow growth and nonspecific presentation, it is often misdiagnosed as other skin or soft tissue lesions. A high index of suspicion is crucial for early recognition and appropriate management. We report the case of an eight-year-old boy who presented with a gradually enlarging, firm, non-tender, mobile swelling on the right cheek over two years. The mass, located anterior and slightly inferior to the right ear near the angle of the mandible, had no associated history of trauma or systemic illness. Surgical excision under general anesthesia was performed. Histopathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of pilomatrixoma. No preoperative imaging was performed, as clinical assessment favored a benign superficial lesion. The patient recovered uneventfully, and no recurrence was observed during a six-month postoperative follow-up. This case underscores the importance of including pilomatrixoma in the differential diagnosis of pediatric facial masses. While our follow-up duration was limited to six months, no signs of recurrence were noted during that period. Timely clinical recognition and complete surgical excision generally yield excellent outcomes, although longer-term surveillance is ideal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.