ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2025
Enhancement of oxaliplatin efficacy and amelioration of intestinal epithelial damage by
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Dual Role of the Gut Microbiota in Cancer Chemoresistance.MicrobiologyOpen · 2026Review
- Comprehensive Analysis of miRNAs, mRNAs, and lncRNAs in Intestines of Breast- and Formula-Fed Pigs.Journal of animal physiology and animal nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, necessitating extensive research into effective treatment strategies. Despite advancements in targeted therapies and immunotherapies, traditional chemotherapy remains the primary treatment modality for most patients. Here, we explored the synergy between Methods: We utilized a BALB/c nude mouse subcutaneous tumor model to assess the therapeutic impacts of LGG and Oxp. Mice were randomized into five groups: negative control, model control, Oxp, LGG, and LGG + Oxp treatment groups. The main outcomes assessed included tumor weight and volume, histopathological changes, and gene expression via qRT-PCR. The gut microbiota composition was examined by 16s rRNA gene sequencing. Results: The combined treatment of LGG and Oxp significantly reduced tumor weight and volume, and improved tumor-associated pathological changes compared to the model group. The LGG treatment also alleviated Oxp-induced intestinal damage and inflammation, maintaining intestinal barrier integrity. The combined treatment modulated genes linked to intestinal barrier function and inflammation, upregulated Conclusion: The combined use of LGG and Oxp offers a promising therapeutic strategy for NSCLC, warranting further investigation into the interplay between probiotics, chemotherapy, and the gut microbiota.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.