ArticlePediatric quality & safety
Assessment of a Stepwise Intervention to Improve Nurse-administered Penicillin Allergy Screening and De-labeling in Pediatric Inpatients.
Article in Pediatric quality & safety. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Penicillins are first-line treatments for many childhood infections, but providers avoid them when patients report a penicillin allergy, although approximately 94% of these patients may tolerate penicillin. Patients with penicillin allergy labels often receive second-line antibiotics, which increases the risk of treatment failure and adverse events. To address this, programs to implement penicillin allergy de-labeling have increased; however, strategies to accomplish de-labeling most efficiently through guideline dissemination have not been well-studied. Methods: A multidisciplinary team created an evidence-based screening algorithm and standard protocol to screen eligible pediatric inpatients and de-label documented penicillin allergies. Plan-do-study-act cycles identified opportunities for improvement to the standard protocol. Results: We developed a screening tool to assess the risk of penicillin allergy and integrated it into the electronic health record for administration by clinical nurses. Follow-up actions, including de-labeling or further testing, are automatically communicated to the provider. Nurse-initiated screening increased from 3.8% to 28.1% after adding an electronic "worklist task" reminder. Allergy de-labeling demonstrated special cause variation following the dissemination of a standardized amoxicillin challenge order set and then again after a brief period of audit and feedback; however, the increases were not sustained. Conclusions: A nurse-administered screening questionnaire and protocolized follow-up actions can help achieve safe de-labeling at hospitals without a dedicated penicillin allergy service.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.