ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Evaluation of a novel chemiluminescent immunoassay for autoantibody detection in pemphigus and bullous pemphigoid.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chemiluminescence Immunoassay and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay in the Diagnosis of Pemphigoid and Pemphigus: A Comparative Study.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Detection of Diagnostic Antibodies in Immune-Mediated Diseases: A Focus on Antigens and Technologies.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A novel fully automated chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) has been developed to quantify autoantibodies specific for desmogleins (Dsg1, Dsg3), BP180, and BP230, key target antigens in pemphigus and bullous pemphigoid. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the CLIA in diagnosing pemphigus and BP and its correlation with disease severity and clinical features. Methods: Sera from 106 bullous pemphigoid and 54 pemphigus patients and control sera from 153 patients with other skin disease and 121 healthy volunteers were included. CLIA and BIOCHIP mosaic-based indirect immunofluorescence (IIFT-BIOCHIP) were performed for all bullous pemphigoid and pemphigus patients, with ELISA conducted for most. Disease severity was assessed using the Body Surface Area scoring. Results: This CLIA showed strong agreement with IIFT-BIOCHIP, achieving area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.92 for anti-Dsg1/anti-Dsg3 and 0.84 for anti-BP180/anti-BP230 for differentiating pemphigus and BP. It outperformed ELISA (AUC: 0.73, 0.75) and was comparable to IIFT-BIOCHIP (AUC: 0.93, 0.87). The assay showed superior detection range and sensitivity compared to ELISA. Autoantibody levels correlated with disease severity and clinical symptoms, with elevated levels of anti-Dsg3 associated with mucosal lesions, anti-Dsg1/anti-Dsg3 associated with Nikolsky sign, and elevated anti-BP180/anti-BP230 levels linked to pruritus. Conclusions: The novel CLIA, the first to quantify four major autoimmune blister disease autoantibodies (anti-Dsg1/anti-Dsg3/anti-BP180/anti-BP230) using a single sample tube, offers a simple and time-efficient test for diagnosing and screening pemphigus and BP. Its ability to assess disease severity and clinical relevance makes it a valuable tool for managing these conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.