ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2025
Trends in Candidemia Over the Last 14 Years: A Comparative Analysis of
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolution of Candidaemia and azole resistance in Italy: A multicentre retrospective study.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026Article
- Observational
- Candidemia in Southern Poland (2017-2022): Multicenter Analysis of Species Distribution and Antifungal Susceptibility.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Nine-Year Surveillance of Candida Bloodstream Infections in a Southern Italian Tertiary Hospital: Species Distribution, Antifungal Resistance, and Stewardship Implications.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Impact of Candida Care Bundle Compliance on the Prognosis of Patients With Candidemia: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study With Propensity Score Matching Analysis (2016-2023).Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Data on the trends of the incidence of candidemia caused by Methods: We conducted a retrospective study (2010-2023) in a 1236-bed tertiary hospital. We included all episodes of candidemia due to Results: Among 576 episodes of candidemia, 269 (46.7%) were caused by Conclusions: Our data do not suggest an increasing trend in the incidence of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.