ArticleJournal of the Saudi Heart Association2025
Rapid Access Chest Pain Assessment Clinic: An Australian Virtual Care Experience.
Article in Journal of the Saudi Heart Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comment on "Rapid Access Chest Pain Assessment Clinic: An Australian Virtual Care Experience".Journal of the Saudi Heart Association · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The Rapid Access Chest Pain Assessment Clinic (RACPAC) streamlines the evaluation of low to intermediate-risk chest pain patients, reducing hospitalisation and healthcare costs. However, there is limited data on the virtual model of care for RACPAC. Aim: We sought to evaluate the structure, cost-effectiveness, and imaging modalities performance of face-to-face and virtual RACPAC in an Australian setting. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients attending the RACPAC within a large Australian quaternary hospital between 2012 and 2021. We described the clinic parameters and imaging modality utilisation with parametric and non-parametric descriptive statics. Patterns of diagnostic modality utilisation were assessed with logistic regression. A p-value<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: 3976 consecutive patients attended RACPAC, with a mean age of 55.2 years (±11.6), and 48.7 % were females. RACPAC transitioned to Virtual service during the COVID-19 pandemic, witnessing the highest attendance rate at 95 %, despite increased patient load by 10.7 %, with a lower re-presentation rate of 1.5 % compared to 2.8 % pre-pandemic (p < 0.01). The revascularisation rates were 34.6 % after positive CT coronary angiogram, 26.7 % for Treadmill Stress Echocardiogram, 20 % for Myocardial Perfusion Scan, and 33.3 % for Invasive Angiogram. The cost-effective analysis of virtual care reduced evaluation costs to one-fourth, with 460 days of in-hospital stays and AUD 283,663 of cost saved annually. Conclusion: This study highlights the feasibility, cost-effectiveness and acceptability of virtual RACPAC, emphasising its potential to extend RACPAC services to remote areas or limited-resource countries. It underscores CTCA's utility as a diagnostic tool in the RACPAC setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.