Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40661863›Full record

ArticleSage open aging

Multidisciplinary Perspectives on Elder Abuse in Belgium: Challenges and Strategies for Intervention.

Peremans Lieve, Castermans Maxime, Aerts Naomi, Bastiaens Hilde, Van Royen Paul, Van Assche Kristof

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sage open aging. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Peremans LieveUniversity of Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6849-0040
Castermans MaximeUniversity of Antwerp, Belgium.
Aerts NaomiUniversity of Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9338-1871
Bastiaens HildeUniversity of Antwerp, Belgium.
Van Royen PaulUniversity of Antwerp, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9554-1680
Van Assche KristofUniversity of Antwerp, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Any effective intervention for elder abuse should start from the perspectives and needs of all stakeholders, including the older persons themselves. Based on face-to-face interviews, this descriptive qualitative study explored the different stakeholders' perspectives and the challenging obstacles in preventing, detecting and addressing elder abuse. The purposive sample included patients and experienced professionals such as nurses, GPs, social workers, notaries, lawyers and judges. The main themes identified were the empowerment of older persons, the need for sensitisation of all key actors, deontological issues and the need for and barriers to interprofessional collaboration. The findings highlight the complexity of elder abuse, the vulnerability of victims, their reluctance to request help and the potential for abuse of powers of attorney. Healthcare professionals identified a tension between maintaining a trust-based relationship and the obligations of secrecy inherent in their professional and interprofessional roles. They advocate for developing and implementing an interprofessional collaboration model that can overcome the obstacles for collaboration and integrate the patient's perspective.

Indexed as

abusecommunicationdecision-makingethicsqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID40661863
PMCPMC12256762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.