ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2025
The predictive embodied mind: a case-based encounter with film aesthetics.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Crossmodal counterpoint: from music to multimedia - incongruency, cognitive dissonance, irony, and surrealism.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Review
- A two-tier model of abduction: a unified framework for perception and emotion.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent decades, the scientific study of the mind has experienced two significant conceptual shifts, each reshaping its research focus. The first, embodied cognition, questioned the objectivist framework of first-generation cognitive science by emphasizing that mental processes are deeply grounded in sensorimotor interactions with the world. Image-schemas have been suggested as one of the foundational conceptual elements underpinning this embodied grounding. The second shift is the revival of perception as an inferential process within the Predictive Processing (PP) framework. PP conceptualizes the mind as a predictive machine that minimizes error by actively anticipating sensory input through probabilistic computations. Rooted in Helmholtz's theory of unconscious inference and updated as the Bayesian brain model, PP has been extended to diverse cognitive phenomena, including perception, emotion, and aesthetics. While its application to the visual arts and cinema has been relatively limited, this article seeks to advance this encounter by bridging PP with cinematic aesthetics. The article is structured into three sections. The first introduces the PP framework, outlining its core theoretical principles and linking it to the concept of image schemas. The second section reviews existing accounts of predictive processing in visual aesthetics, particularly in the non-temporal arts, and introduces a new case study of narrative painting that builds on Ladislav Kesner's work on PP in art interpretation. In the final section we move to the temporal art form of narrative cinema, proposing that films engage the brain's inferential processes by activating image schemas through deliberate formal design. By structuring sensory input in alignment with the brain's predictive logic, cinematic works of art enhance both comprehension and the aesthetic pleasure derived from resolving predictions into coherent patterns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.