ArticleJournal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology2025
Causal mediation analysis: selection with asymptotically valid inference.
Article in Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deciphering the glioblastoma microenvironmental landscape with multi-modal radiogenomics to guide prognosis and personalized therapy.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- From stress to exhaustion: the mediating role of meaning of work in the relationship between role conflict and emotional exhaustion among preschool teachers.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Adaptive Sparsening and Smoothing of the Treatment Model for Longitudinal Causal Inference Using Outcome-Adaptive LASSO and Marginal Fused LASSO.Statistics in medicine · 2026Article
- Debiased machine learning for ultra-high dimensional mediation analysis.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Researchers are often interested in learning not only the effect of treatments on outcomes, but also the mechanisms that transmit these effects. A mediator is a variable that is affected by treatment and subsequently affects outcome. Existing methods for penalized mediation analyses may lead to ignoring important mediators and either assume that finite-dimensional linear models are sufficient to remove confounding bias, or perform no confounding control at all. In practice, these assumptions may not hold. We propose a method that considers the confounding functions as nuisance parameters to be estimated using data-adaptive methods. We then use a novel regularization method applied to this objective function to identify a set of important mediators. We consider natural direct and indirect effects as our target parameters. We then proceed to derive the asymptotic properties of our estimators and establish the oracle property under specific assumptions. Asymptotic results are also presented in a local setting, which contrast the proposal with the standard adaptive lasso. We also propose a perturbation bootstrap technique to provide asymptotically valid postselection inference for the mediated effects of interest. The performance of these methods will be discussed and demonstrated through simulation studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.