Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40661828›Full record

ArticleDrug design, development and therapy2025

Evaluating the Opioid-Related Adverse Events of Oliceridine Versus Conventional Opioids in Patient-Controlled Analgesia After Thoracoscopic Lung Resection: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Chengya Huang, Biying Liu, Shouyu Xie, Yunyun Zhang, Kun Liu, Yuwei Qiu, Jingxiang Wu

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Drug design, development and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chengya Huang *Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200030, People's Republic of China.
Biying Liu *Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200030, People's Republic of China.
Shouyu XieDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200030, People's Republic of China.
Yunyun ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200030, People's Republic of China.
Kun LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200030, People's Republic of China.
Yuwei QiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200030, People's Republic of China.
Jingxiang WuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200030, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Oliceridine, a novel biased mu-opioid receptor agonist, provides analgesia comparable to morphine but with a potentially improved side effect profile. However, the comparative incidence of opioid-related adverse events (ORADEs) in patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) remains understudied. This study aims to elucidate the differences in ORADE rates between oliceridine and conventional opioids in PCIA. Methods: We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study at Shanghai Chest Hospital, analyzing linked healthcare data. Propensity score matching (PSM) addressed selection bias. The study included patients who received PCIA with either oliceridine or conventional opioids (sufentanil, hydromorphone and oxycodone) after thoracoscopic lung resection from January 2024 to June 2024. ORADEs assessed included postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), urinary retention, and opioid-induced respiratory depression (OIRD). Demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes within the first 24 hours post-surgery were collected. Results: From 8208 eligible patients, 3171 received oliceridine and 5037 received conventional opioids. After PSM, 2803 matched pairs were analyzed, with similar demographics and morphine equivalent doses between groups. The incidence of ORADEs was significantly lower in the oliceridine group compared to the conventional opioids group, with rates of 24.30% versus 27.83% (P < 0.01). Specifically, the oliceridine group had a reduced likelihood of PONV (15.45% vs 19.73%; Relative Risk [RR], 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70-0.88; P < 0.001). No significant differences were found in OIRD or urinary retention rates. Conclusion: Oliceridine use in PCIA was associated with a lower incidence of ORADEs, primarily driven by reduced PONV, compared to conventional opioids. These findings suggest oliceridine may be a safer alternative for postoperative pain management, warranting confirmation in larger prospective randomized trials. This study is among the first to provide a comprehensive comparative analysis of ORADEs between oliceridine and conventional opioids in a real-world PCIA setting, offering valuable insights into optimizing postoperative pain management strategies.

Indexed as

Analgesia, Patient-ControlledAnalgesics, OpioidPostoperative PainThoracoscopyAdultAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSpiro CompoundsThiophenes((3-methoxythiophen-2-yl)methyl)((2-(9-(pyridin-2-yl)-6-oxaspiro(4.5)decan-9-yl)ethyl))amineAnalgesics, OpioidSpiro CompoundsThiophenesoliceridineopioid-related adverse events (ORADEs)patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA)postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV)

Identifiers

PMID40661828
PMCPMC12258402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.