Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40661823›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Excision of an Unexpected Retroperitoneal Mass at Laparoscopy.

Tejal Date, Abhijit Aich, Haissam Moukarram

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tejal DateObstetrics and Gynaecology, North Cumbria Integrated Care, National Health Service (NHS) Trust, Whitehaven, GBR.
Abhijit AichObstetrics and Gynaecology, North Cumbria Integrated Care, National Health Service (NHS) Trust, Whitehaven, GBR.
Haissam MoukarramObstetrics and Gynaecology, North Cumbria Integrated Care, National Health Service (NHS) Trust, Whitehaven, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurofibroma is a benign soft tissue tumour of neural origin. Neurofibromatosis or Von Recklinghausen disease is an autosomal-dominant condition. Pelvic occurrence of a solitary neurofibroma is uncommon. A 54-year-old woman presented with a history of chronic back pain with occasional dyspareunia for 12 months. She had a hysterectomy and right salpingo-oophorectomy for endometriosis many years back. Clinical examination revealed fullness and tenderness at left vaginal vault. Pelvic ultrasonography revealed a 55x49x55mm mass suggestive of dermoid cyst. Magnetic resonance imaging findings were consistent with dermoid cyst. Intraoperatively, a retroperitoneal mass in the left pelvic sidewall was removed along with left fallopian tube and ovary. Histopathology revealed neurofibroma. There was no recurrence on follow-up. Solitary, de novo, retroperitoneal pelvic neurofibroma is very rare. A lack of familiarity with the anatomy and pathogenesis of retroperitoneal masses often leads to a diagnostic conundrum due to overlapping imaging findings. A possibility of neurofibroma or schwannoma should be kept in mind while evaluating pelvic and/or adnexal masses.

Indexed as

adnexal massesovarian cystovarian dermoid cystpelvic massessolitary neurofibroma

Identifiers

PMID40661823
PMCPMC12258655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.