ArticleCureus2025
Excision of an Unexpected Retroperitoneal Mass at Laparoscopy.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neurofibroma is a benign soft tissue tumour of neural origin. Neurofibromatosis or Von Recklinghausen disease is an autosomal-dominant condition. Pelvic occurrence of a solitary neurofibroma is uncommon. A 54-year-old woman presented with a history of chronic back pain with occasional dyspareunia for 12 months. She had a hysterectomy and right salpingo-oophorectomy for endometriosis many years back. Clinical examination revealed fullness and tenderness at left vaginal vault. Pelvic ultrasonography revealed a 55x49x55mm mass suggestive of dermoid cyst. Magnetic resonance imaging findings were consistent with dermoid cyst. Intraoperatively, a retroperitoneal mass in the left pelvic sidewall was removed along with left fallopian tube and ovary. Histopathology revealed neurofibroma. There was no recurrence on follow-up. Solitary, de novo, retroperitoneal pelvic neurofibroma is very rare. A lack of familiarity with the anatomy and pathogenesis of retroperitoneal masses often leads to a diagnostic conundrum due to overlapping imaging findings. A possibility of neurofibroma or schwannoma should be kept in mind while evaluating pelvic and/or adnexal masses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.