Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40661811›Full record

ArticleFood science & nutrition2025

Enhanced Leaf Disease Segmentation Using U-Net Architecture for Precision Agriculture: A Deep Learning Approach.

Gurpreet Singh, Asma A Al-Huqail, Ahmad Almogren, Sukhdeep Kaur, Kapil Joshi, Ajay Singh, Salil Bharany, Seada Hussen, Ateeq Ur Rehman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food science & nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Gurpreet SinghChitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology Chitkara University Punjab India.
Asma A Al-HuqailDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science King Saud University Riyadh Saudi Arabia.
Ahmad AlmogrenDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computer and Information Sciences King Saud University Riyadh Saudi Arabia.
Sukhdeep KaurDepartment of CSE UIT, Uttaranchal University Dehradun Uttarakhand India.
Kapil JoshiDepartment of CSE UIT, Uttaranchal University Dehradun Uttarakhand India.
Ajay SinghSchool of Applied and Life Sciences Uttaranchal University Dehradun Uttarakhand India.
Salil BharanyChitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology Chitkara University Punjab India.
Seada HussenDepartment of Electrical Power Adama Science and Technology University Adama Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4251-2971
Ateeq Ur RehmanSchool of Computing Gachon University Seongnam-si Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study presents a deep learning-based image segmentation approach for leaf disease identification using the U-Net architecture. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs), particularly U-Net, are effective for precise segmentation tasks and were trained and validated on a high-quality "Leaf Disease Segmentation" dataset. Each image contains annotated regions of unhealthy leaf tissue, enabling the model to distinguish between healthy and infected areas. Image preprocessing and augmentation further enhanced model performance and robustness. The U-Net model, composed of an encoder for context extraction and a decoder for precise segmentation was trained to accurately identify diseased regions at the pixel level. Regularization techniques such as dropout, batch normalization, and ReLU activation were used to prevent overfitting and improve learning. Furthermore, Adam optimizer was employed with a learning rate of 0.001. The model demonstrated strong generalization by accurately segmenting disease regions in unseen validation images. It effectively captured complex patterns in both healthy and diseased leaf sections, outperforming traditional image processing techniques. Trained on 7056 images for 40 epochs, the model achieved 99.70% training accuracy, 0.062 training loss, and 98.99% validation accuracy. These results highlight the model's high accuracy, efficient learning, and robustness, making it suitable for real-world applications in precision agriculture.

Indexed as

CNNdeep learningimage processingleaf disease segmentationplant pathologyprecision agriculturesemantic segmentationU‐Net architecture

Identifiers

PMID40661811
PMCPMC12257497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.