ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Efficacy and safety of cadonilimab (PD-1/CTLA-4 bi-specific antibody) and adjuvant anti-angiogenesis therapy in treated, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of cadonilimab for malignant solid tumor treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of Cadonilimab in the treatment of recurrent/metastatic and advanced cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Ivonescimab combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic cervical cancer: A case report and literature review.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Combined immunotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy have exhibited synergistic antitumor effects in several cancers. The prognosis of recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer (r/mCC) is poor, especially for patients with prior multi-line treatments. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cadonilimab(PD-1/CTLA-4 bispecific)with anti-angiogenesis adjuvant therapy (bevacizumab or anlotinib) in pretreated patients with r/mCC. Methods: Nineteen patients treated with cadonilimab plus bevacizumab or anlotinib with or without chemotherapy were included. Cadonilimab was administered at dose of 10mg/kg intravenously. Patients receiving anti-angiogenic therapy received either bevacizumab or anlotinib administered orally. The safety, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed. Results: The median follow-up was 15.5 months study patients. Among all 19 patients, 2 patients (10.5%) achieved complete response (CR), 2 patients (10.5%) achieved partial response (PR) and 4 patients (21.1%) achieved stable disease (SD), with an ORR of 21.1% and DCR of 42.1%. Moreover, the median PFS was 10.5 months (95% CI: 6.1-14.9 months) and 1-year OS rate was 78.3%. Proteinuria (47.4%) and hypertension (42.2%) were the most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAE), with 5 (26.3%) patients experiencing Grade 3 TRAEs, while no treatment related deaths were observed. Conclusions: This is the first report exploring the efficacy and safety of treating patients concurrently with Cadonilimab plus bevacizumab or anlotinib with heavily pretreated r/mCC. The findings suggest that this regimen might be potentially efficacious and safe with relatively manageable toxicity. Further trials with a control arm are required to validate our findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.