ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Prevalence of human papillomavirus genotypes in Latvia among women participating in cervical cancer screening.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond HPV in Eastern Europe: Genotype Distribution, Molecular Biomarkers, Vaginal Microbiome, and Implications for Cervical Cancer Prevention.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Article
- Spatial transcriptomic landscape and cellular neighborhood heterogeneity in cervical cancer: integrative single-cell and spatial RNA sequencing analysis.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Persistently high prevalence of HPV16 and rising prevalence of non-16/18 HR-HPV genotypes in cervical precancer and cancer in Latvia in 2016-2024 shape the severity of cervical disease.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objectives: The propensity of human papillomavirus (HPV) to cause cervical cancer is linked to specific genotypes that vary in carcinogenicity. This study aims to provide insight into the most prevalent HPV genotypes in Latvia among women participating in cervical cancer screening. Materials and methods: The prevalence data presented in this study were derived from routine screening. The data were collected during the first two years of the reorganized screening program, from 1 July 2022 to 1 July 2024, which for the first time included HPV genotyping as a primary screening method in women aged 30-70. Testing was performed in an accredited laboratory using a commercial kit capable of detecting 14 HPV genotypes. Results: The overall prevalence among 30-70-year-old women participating in cervical cancer screening in Latvia was 12.04%. HPV 16 was the most prevalent HPV genotype, followed by HPV 68, 31, 66, 52, 56, 51, 45, 33, 39, 18, 58, 59, and 35. Across all age categories, single infections were the most prevalent-81.82% of women tested positive for only one HPV genotype, with an average of 1.23 genotypes per positive sample. The prevalence of both single and co- infections tended to decrease with age, except for a slight increase in the oldest age group, women aged 60-70. There was a significant difference in the overall HPV infection prevalence across age groups. Conclusions: These results provide valuable epidemiological data that can inform cervical cancer screening, prognosis, HPV vaccine implementation targeting region-specific genotypes, and ongoing monitoring of genotype distribution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.