Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40661737›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025

Microdissection testicular sperm extraction-intracytoplasmic sperm injection strategy in patients with Klinefelter syndrome: synchronous or asynchronous?

Ke Feng, Jin-Wei Wang, Yan-Qing Xia, Xiao-Wei Qu, Feng Wan, Bo Zhang, Cui-Lian Zhang, Hai-Bin Guo, Lei-Lei Feng, Ying-Hong Fang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ke FengDepartment of Reproductive Medicine Center, Henan University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Jin-Wei WangDepartment of Reproductive Medicine Center, Henan University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Yan-Qing XiaReproductive Medicine Center, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Xiao-Wei QuReproductive Medicine Center, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Feng WanReproductive Medicine Center, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Bo ZhangReproductive Medicine Center, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Cui-Lian ZhangDepartment of Reproductive Medicine Center, Henan University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Hai-Bin GuoDepartment of Reproductive Medicine Center, Henan University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Lei-Lei FengDepartment of Reproductive Medicine Center, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.
Ying-Hong FangDepartment of Reproductive Medicine Center, Zhengzhou University People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with fresh versus cryopreserved sperm retrieved via microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) in patients with Klinefelter syndrome (KS). Design: A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Setting: This study was performed at the Reproductive Medicine Center of Henan Provincial People's Hospital. Participants: A total of 260 men with KS, including 5 patients with mosaic KS, underwent mTESE,124 of whom successfully provided sperm. These patients were divided into synchronous (fresh sperm) and asynchronous (cryopreserved sperm) groups for ICSI treatment. Interventions: Fresh or cryopreserved sperm were used in the ICSI cycles. Main outcome measures: The primary outcomes were the clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate, and miscarriage rate. The secondary outcomes were two pronuclei (2PN) embryos, available embryos, and the blastocyst formation rate. The number of oocytes retrieved and metaphase II (MII) oocytes were considered female-related indicators and treated as potential confounding variables in the multivariate analyses, given their influence on embryo development and pregnancy outcomes. Results: A total of 260 KS patients underwent mTESE, with the successful retrieval of sperm suitable for ICSI in assisted reproduction from 124 (47.7%). Among these, 73 had their sperm cryopreserved at low temperature before ICSI, while 51 had their fresh sperm directly used for ICSI. The analysis of 170 treatment cycles revealed no significant differences in baseline characteristics (infertility duration, body mass index (BMI), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), testosterone (T)) between the groups. Compared with the asynchronous group, the synchronous group had more oocytes retrieved, MII oocytes, gestational sacs, and good-quality embryos. However, there were no significant differences in 2PN embryos, 2PN fertilization rates, total embryos, available embryos, good-quality embryo rates, clinical pregnancy rates, live birth rates, or miscarriage rates between the two groups. LASSO regression and ROC curve analysis demonstrated the limited ability of differential indicators to predict pregnancy outcomes. Conclusions: In KS patients undergoing ICSI, the use of fresh or cryopreserved testicular sperm did not significantly affect pregnancy outcomes. While fresh sperm have advantages in improving certain laboratory parameters, their overall ability to predict pregnancy outcomes is limited.

Indexed as

Klinefelter SyndromeMicrodissectionSperm Injections, IntracytoplasmicSperm RetrievalTestisAdultCryopreservationFemaleHumansMalePregnancyPregnancy OutcomePregnancy RateRetrospective Studiesasynchronousintracytoplasmic sperm injection(ICSI)Klinefelter syndrome(KS)microdissection testicular sperm extraction(mTESE)synchronous

Identifiers

PMID40661737
PMCPMC12256237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.