ArticleVascular health and risk management2025
Large and Giant Intracranial Aneurysm: Surgical Management and Outcomes in a Tertiary Hospital.
Article in Vascular health and risk management, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Large and giant intracranial aneurysms, exceeding 10 mm and 25 mm in diameter, respectively, are rare in neurosurgery. These lesions carry substantial morbidity and mortality risks, often causing mass effects, intracranial hemorrhage, stroke, or seizures. Methods: We present our experience with 54 patients diagnosed with these aneurysms. We conducted neurological assessments and preoperative evaluations using the modified Rankin Scale. Individualized treatment strategies, employing surgical techniques or endovascular embolization, were tailored to each patient. Results: The cohort included 28 females and 26 males, averaging 46.9 years. Aneurysms were predominantly in the anterior circulation (80.6%), with initial symptoms including mass effect (78.7%), cerebral ischemia (8.3%), intracranial hemorrhage (3%), and seizures (2.8%). Surgical interventions, including direct clipping, aneurysmal wall resection, aneurysmorrhaphy with clipping, and cross-clamping (average duration: 20 minutes), were performed in 32 cases (59.2%). Endovascular coiling was utilized in 22 patients (40.8%), with 10 requiring flow diverter stents. Of the cases, 32 were giant aneurysms, and 22 were large aneurysms. Outcomes ranged from favourable to excellent in 70.4% of patients, while 18.5% experienced poor outcomes, primarily in posterior circulation aneurysms or due to poor preoperative conditions. The overall mortality rate was 11.1%, with eight fatalities. Conclusion: Management of giant intracranial aneurysms remains challenging, with higher morbidity and mortality rates compared to other neurosurgical conditions. No universally effective technique exists, emphasizing the importance of meticulous perioperative planning and surgical expertise. Further research and treatment advancements are needed to enhance the management of these complex aneurysms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.