Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40661691›Full record

ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2025

Enhancing Pediatric Interns' Clinical Skills Through Simulation-Based Training.

Hongjun Ba, Lingling Xu, Huimin Peng, Yufen Gu, Yijuan Li, Xiaoyun Jiang, Xiaoyu Li, Shujuan Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hongjun Ba *Pediatric Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China.
Lingling Xu *Pediatric Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0001-9074-6145
Huimin PengPediatric Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China.
Yufen GuPediatric Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China.
Yijuan LiPediatric Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoyun JiangPediatric Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoyu LiPediatric Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China.
Shujuan LiPediatric Department, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Situational simulation teaching enhances students' practical skills and clinical decision-making by replicating real-world scenarios. Pediatric practice often involves complex, dynamic situations, making it crucial for students to gain experience in a controlled environment where repeated practice can develop clinical expertise. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of situational simulation in pediatric clinical practice by comparing its impact on trainees' skills with that of conventional teaching methods. Methods: A total of 52 pediatric trainees were randomly assigned to two groups: one participating in situational simulation training and the other receiving traditional instruction over a six-week period. A mixed-method approach, including formal assessments and Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercises (Mini-CEX), was used to assess knowledge, clinical abilities, and overall competencies. A feedback survey was also administered to the simulation group to evaluate the impact of simulation-based training on their learning outcomes. Results: Theoretical exam performance was comparable between both groups, with no significant difference (p > 0.05). However, the situational simulation group showed significant improvements in key skills compared to the traditional group: medical history taking (26.92% vs 69.23%, p = 0.005), clinical judgment (19.23% vs 46.15%, p = 0.011), doctor-patient communication (26.92% vs 61.54%, p = 0.025), and overall clinical competence (19.23% vs 57.69%, p = 0.009). The simulation group also reported higher satisfaction and demonstrated superior competency in practical assessments. Conclusion: This study confirms that situational simulation effectively improves pediatric clinical skills, especially in practical competence and patient communication. The findings support further integration of simulation-based teaching into pediatric training programs to enhance clinical readiness and confidence.

Indexed as

medical competenciesmedical trainingmini-clinical assessmentpediatric clinical trainingsituational simulation teaching

Identifiers

PMID40661691
PMCPMC12258202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.