ArticleAdvances in medical education and practice2025
Enhancing Pediatric Interns' Clinical Skills Through Simulation-Based Training.
Article in Advances in medical education and practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of the situation-background-assessment-recommendation model combined with the mini-CEX assessment on the clinical communication, clinical thinking and comprehensive clinical abilities of nursing interns.BMC medical education · 2025Trial
- Application and evaluation of a virtual patient system based on a multi-branch dynamic decision model in orthopedic graduate medical education.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- From Simulation to Bedside: the Missing Link in Pediatric Training Research [Response to Letter].Advances in medical education and practice · 2025Article
- From Simulation to Bedside: The Missing Link in Pediatric Training Research [Letter].Advances in medical education and practice · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Situational simulation teaching enhances students' practical skills and clinical decision-making by replicating real-world scenarios. Pediatric practice often involves complex, dynamic situations, making it crucial for students to gain experience in a controlled environment where repeated practice can develop clinical expertise. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of situational simulation in pediatric clinical practice by comparing its impact on trainees' skills with that of conventional teaching methods. Methods: A total of 52 pediatric trainees were randomly assigned to two groups: one participating in situational simulation training and the other receiving traditional instruction over a six-week period. A mixed-method approach, including formal assessments and Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercises (Mini-CEX), was used to assess knowledge, clinical abilities, and overall competencies. A feedback survey was also administered to the simulation group to evaluate the impact of simulation-based training on their learning outcomes. Results: Theoretical exam performance was comparable between both groups, with no significant difference (p > 0.05). However, the situational simulation group showed significant improvements in key skills compared to the traditional group: medical history taking (26.92% vs 69.23%, p = 0.005), clinical judgment (19.23% vs 46.15%, p = 0.011), doctor-patient communication (26.92% vs 61.54%, p = 0.025), and overall clinical competence (19.23% vs 57.69%, p = 0.009). The simulation group also reported higher satisfaction and demonstrated superior competency in practical assessments. Conclusion: This study confirms that situational simulation effectively improves pediatric clinical skills, especially in practical competence and patient communication. The findings support further integration of simulation-based teaching into pediatric training programs to enhance clinical readiness and confidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.