ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
Relationship between timing of achieving energy sufficiency and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Analysis of the predictive value of 3-day cumulative energy deficit for 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis and nutritional risk: a retrospective study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and aim: Malnutrition is a critical challenge in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, with the timing of energy sufficiency being a key yet debated factor in nutritional support. This study aimed to investigate the association between the timing of achieving energy sufficiency (defined as ≥70% of daily energy targets, 17.5 kcal/kg/day) in critically ill patients and their clinical outcomes, providing evidence-based guidance for ICU nutritional protocols. Methods: In this prospective observational study, adult patients admitted to the ICU for ≥3 days were stratified into three groups based on the time to achieve energy sufficiency: early (≤3 days), middle (4-7 days), and late (>7 days). Clinical outcomes, including in-hospital mortality, 60-day mortality, ICU length of stay, and gastrointestinal complications, were compared across groups. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess the independent association between energy sufficiency timing and mortality, while restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis explored nonlinear dose-response relationships using days to energy sufficiency as a continuous variable. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 25.0 and R 4.2.3 (two-tailed tests, Results: A total of 826 critically ill patients were initially screened, with 584 meeting the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria and ultimately enrolled in this study. The middle-group patients (achieving energy sufficiency at 4-7 days) demonstrated the lowest in-hospital mortality (15.6%) and 60-day mortality (28.5%), significantly lower than the late group (32.0 and 49.0%, respectively; Conclusion: The timing of achieving energy sufficiency (17.5 kcal/kg/day) is significantly associated with 60-day mortality in ICU patients. Combining RCS-derived inflection point (day 6) and intergroup comparisons, the optimal window for achieving energy sufficiency appears to be 4-6 days post-ICU admission, balancing metabolic stability and tissue repair needs while avoiding early overfeeding risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.