ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2025
Machine learning prediction of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease risk in American adults using body composition: explainable analysis based on SHapley Additive exPlanations.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Muscle Mass Moderates Metabolic Syndrome Risk Associated with Adiposity: A SHAP-Based Machine Learning Study.Nutrients · 2026Article
- The application of explainable machine learning for the identification of MASLD in non-obese populations.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of an Explainable Machine Learning Model for Prediction of Massive Transfusion in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Article
- Deconvolution of molecular mechanisms in di-n-butyl phthalate/mono-n-butyl phthalate induced diabetic kidney disease by integrated machine learning and molecular docking.BMC nephrology · 2025Article
- Development of a machine learning model for hepatic steatosis screening using non-invasive Traditional Chinese Medicine diagnostics and clinical variables: a health checkup study with community screening potential.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is a prevalent and progressive liver disorder closely linked to obesity and metabolic dysregulation. Traditional anthropometric measures such as body mass index (BMI) are limited in their ability to capture fat distribution and associated risk. This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning (ML) models for predicting MAFLD using detailed body composition metrics and to explore the relative contributions of adipose tissue features through explainable ML techniques. Methods: Data from the 2017-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) were used to construct predictive models based on anthropometric, demographic, lifestyle, and clinical variables. Six ML algorithms were implemented: decision tree (DT), support vector machine (SVM), generalized linear model (GLM), gradient boosting machine (GBM), random forest (RF), and XGBoost. The Boruta algorithm was used for feature selection, and model performance was evaluated using cross-validation and a validation set. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were employed to interpret feature contributions. Results: Among the six models, the GBM algorithm exhibited the best performance, achieving area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values of 0.875 (training) and 0.879 (validation), with minimal fluctuations in sensitivity and specificity. SHAP analysis identified visceral adipose tissue (VAT), BMI, and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) as the most influential predictors. VAT had the highest SHAP value, underscoring its central role in MAFLD pathogenesis. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the effectiveness of integrating body composition features with machine learning techniques for MAFLD risk prediction. The GBM model offers robust predictive accuracy and interpretability, with potential applications in clinical decision-making and public health screening strategies. SHAP analysis provides meaningful insights into the relative importance of adiposity measures, reinforcing the value of fat distribution metrics beyond conventional obesity indices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.