SynthesisFrontiers in nutrition2025
Current status and influencing factors of enteral nutrition interruption among critical patients: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of a Staged Enteral Nutrition Nursing Pathway Based on Dynamic Assessment of Tolerance and Aspiration Risk vs Usual Care on Feeding Intolerance in Older Adult Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke and Dysphagia: A Single-Center Randomized Controlled Trial.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Trial
- Uremic Toxins and Mortality in Patients With Acute Kidney Injury Prior to and During Continuous Kidney Replacement Therapy.Kidney medicine · 2026Article
- Beyond Early Initiation: Predictors of Successful Early Enteral Nutrition Advancement in Critically Ill Patients.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Interruptions of enteral nutrition in intensive care units: mechanisms, clinical impacts, and precision nursing interventions-a scoping review.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Review
- Safety of Early Mobilisation in Critically Ill Patients Under Unusual High-Risk Conditions: A Latin American Case Series.Case reports in critical care · 2026Article
- Risk of gastrointestinal intolerance and complications associated with homemade versus commercial enteral nutrition in critically ill patients: a single-center retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study systematically reviewed and elucidated the current status and key determinants of enteral nutrition interruption (ENI) in critically ill patients. By shedding light on these factors, we aimed to furnish compelling evidence to mitigate the occurrence of ENI in this critical setting. Methods: We embarked on a comprehensive search across seven prominent databases, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus, EBSCO, and Ovid Medline, spanning from their inception to 27 May 2024. Two independent researchers meticulously screened and assessed the quality of the literature, extracting data on the current status and influencing factors of ENI. This rigorous approach culminated in a descriptive systematic review and analysis. Results: From an initial pool of 2,984 studies, 28 were deemed suitable for inclusion in this review, comprising 20 cross-sectional and eight cohort studies. Moreover, 16 studies highlighted ENI incidence rates ranging from 4.7% to a staggering 100%, with an overall average of 48.3%. Among 17 studies, a total of 4,890 ENI episodes were reported involving 2,008 critically ill patients, translating to an average of 2-3 episodes per patient. Four studies detailed the cumulative ENI duration in 327 critically ill patients, totaling 11037.2 h, with an individual average of 33.8 h per patient. The analysis revealed four primary factors influencing ENI: procedures, gastrointestinal events, feeding tube problems, and hemodynamic instability. Procedures accounted for 29.8%-85.0% of ENI frequency and 34.6%-81.2% of duration, with averages of 63.4% and 52.1%, respectively. Gastrointestinal events contributed to 9.4%-59.7% of ENI frequency and 11.5%-21.4% of duration, averaging 19.2% and 18.1%. Feeding tube problems ranged from 0.9% to 29.3% in frequency and 1.3%-25.6% in duration, with averages of 9.3% and 11.6%. Hemodynamic instability was responsible for 0.9%-20.0% of ENI frequency and 1.1%-5.1% of duration, averaging 3.9% and 2.6%. Conclusion: The incidence and frequency of ENI in critically ill patients are notably high, with interruptions lasting for extended durations. The primary culprits, procedures, gastrointestinal events, feeding tube problems, and hemodynamic instability, influenced ENI occurrence. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_recordphp?ID=CRD42024554417, identifier CRD42024554417.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.