ArticleFrontiers in physiology2025
Machine learning prediction and interpretability analysis of high-risk chest pain: a study from the MIMIC-IV database.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning-based prediction of post-thrombotic syndrome in unprovoked lower extremity deep vein thrombosis: a two-center study incorporating uric acid and clinical risk factors.European journal of medical research · 2026Article
- Disease classification via interpretable machine learning based on multi-center routine coagulation test.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: High-risk chest pain is a critical presentation in emergency departments, frequently indicative of life-threatening cardiopulmonary conditions. Rapid and accurate diagnosis is pivotal for improving patient survival rates. Methods: We developed a machine learning prediction model using the MIMIC-IV database (n = 14,716 patients, including 1,302 high-risk cases). To address class imbalance, we implemented feature engineering with SMOTE and under-sampling techniques. Model optimization was performed via Bayesian hyperparameter tuning. Seven algorithms were evaluated: Logistic Regression, Random Forest, SVM, XGBoost, LightGBM, TabTransformer, and TabNet. Results: The LightGBM model demonstrated superior performance with accuracy = 0.95, precision = 0.95, recall = 0.95, and F1-score = 0.94. SHAP analysis revealed maximum troponin and creatine kinase-MB levels as the top predictive features. Conclusion: Our optimized LightGBM model provides clinically significant predictive capability for high-risk chest pain, offering emergency physicians a decision-support tool to enhance diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.