Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40661663›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2025

Machine learning prediction and interpretability analysis of high-risk chest pain: a study from the MIMIC-IV database.

Hongyi Chen, Haiyang Song, Hongyu Huang, Xiaojun Fang, Huang Chen, Qingqing Yang, Junyu Zhang, Wenjun Ding, Zheng Gong, Jun Ke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Hongyi Chen *Fujian Provincial Hospital, Department of Emergency, Fuzhou, China.
Haiyang Song *Fujian Provincial Hospital, Department of Emergency, Fuzhou, China.
Hongyu HuangShengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Xiaojun FangFujian Funeng General Hospital, Department of Emergency, Fuzhou, China.
Huang ChenFuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Department of Emergency, Fuzhou, China.
Qingqing YangFujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Emergency Medicine, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Junyu ZhangSchool of Electronics and Information Engineering, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin, China.
Wenjun DingSchool of Informatics, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China.
Zheng GongFujian Provincial Hospital, Department of Emergency, Fuzhou, China.
Jun KeFuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Department of Emergency, Fuzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: High-risk chest pain is a critical presentation in emergency departments, frequently indicative of life-threatening cardiopulmonary conditions. Rapid and accurate diagnosis is pivotal for improving patient survival rates. Methods: We developed a machine learning prediction model using the MIMIC-IV database (n = 14,716 patients, including 1,302 high-risk cases). To address class imbalance, we implemented feature engineering with SMOTE and under-sampling techniques. Model optimization was performed via Bayesian hyperparameter tuning. Seven algorithms were evaluated: Logistic Regression, Random Forest, SVM, XGBoost, LightGBM, TabTransformer, and TabNet. Results: The LightGBM model demonstrated superior performance with accuracy = 0.95, precision = 0.95, recall = 0.95, and F1-score = 0.94. SHAP analysis revealed maximum troponin and creatine kinase-MB levels as the top predictive features. Conclusion: Our optimized LightGBM model provides clinically significant predictive capability for high-risk chest pain, offering emergency physicians a decision-support tool to enhance diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes.

Indexed as

bayesian optimizationhigh-risk chest pain predictionmachine learning (ML)MIMIC-IVmodel interpretability

Identifiers

PMID40661663
PMCPMC12256431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.