Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40661657›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025

Applying a logistic regression-clustering joint model to analyze the causes of prolonged pre-analytic turnaround time for urine culture testing in hospital wards.

Shuangshuang Lv, Huan Ye, Yuan Li, Jian Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shuangshuang LvClinical Laboratory, Dongyang People's Hospital, Dongyang, Zhejiang, China.
Huan YeClinical Laboratory, The Second People's Hospital of Yuhuan City, Yuhuan, Zhejiang, China.
Yuan LiClinical Laboratory, Dongyang People's Hospital, Dongyang, Zhejiang, China.
Jian ZhangClinical Laboratory, Dongyang People's Hospital, Dongyang, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In this study, we developed and validated a logistic regression-clustering joint model to: (1) quantify multistage workflow bottlenecks (collection/transport/reception) in urine culture pre-TAT prolongation (>115 min); and (2) assess the efficacy of targeted interventions derived from model-derived insights. Methods: Using complete workflow data obtained from 1,343 urine culture specimens (January 2024-March 2024) collected at a tertiary hospital, we integrated binary logistic regression analysis with K-means clustering to quantify delay patterns. The analyzed variables included collection time, ward type, personnel roles, and patient demographics. Post-intervention data (May 2024-July 2024, * Results: Analysis of the critical risk factors revealed that specimens collected between 04:00-05:59/10:00-11:59 had 142.92-fold higher delay odds (95% CI: 58.81-347.37). Those collected on SICU/ICU wards showed 9.98-fold higher risk (95% CI: 5.05-19.72) than general wards. Regarding intervention efficacy, pre-TAT overtime rates decreased by 58.6% (13.48% → 7.55%, Discussion: The joint model effectively identified workflow bottlenecks. Targeted interventions (dynamic transport scheduling, standardized training, and IoT alert systems) significantly optimized pre-TAT and specimen quality, providing a framework for improving clinical laboratory processes.

Indexed as

logistic regression modelmedical quality controlpre-analytical turnaround time (pre-TAT)process optimizationurine microbial culture

Identifiers

PMID40661657
PMCPMC12256443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.