Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40661573›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Microglia surveillance is directed toward neuron activation during sustained intracortical microstimulation.

C Preszler, K Stieger, K Chen, G Zhang, Tdy Kozai

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

C PreszlerDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, USA.
K StiegerDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, USA.
K ChenDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, USA.
G ZhangDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, USA.
Tdy KozaiDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2507-3295

Funding

Using Electrical Stimulation to Modulation Microglia and the Conversion of Microglia PhenotypesR01NS115707 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KOZAI, TAKASHI DANIEL YOSHIDA · 2020 to 2024
$3.2M
Subcellular Wireless Axons for in vivo Localized Neuronal ExcitationR01NS105691 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Takashi Daniel Yoshida Kozai, Wen Li · 2020 to 2026
$3.1M
Mechanisms of Oligodendrocyte Activity on Chronic Brain Implants and Recording PerformanceR01NS129632 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI FRANCA CAMBI, Takashi Daniel Yoshida Kozai · 2023 to 2026
$2.4M
Astrocyte-Neuron Network Activity During In Vivo Brain StimulationF31NS125982 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI STIEGER, KEVIN · 2022 to 2024
$103k
NINDS NIH HHS F31 NS125982NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS105691NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS115707NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS129632
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) is a widely used tool for neuroprostheses, but its long-term efficacy is often limited by biofouling and neuroinflammatory responses at the electrode-tissue interface. Microglia orchestrate neuroinflammation and regulate synaptic plasticity, and low-frequency stimulation has been shown to promote anti-inflammatory microglial phenotypes. We therefore examined, over the first three days post-implantation, how 10-Hz ICMS influences microglial-neuronal interactions in vivo using two-photon imaging in Cx3cr1-GFP/jRGECO1a mice. A one-hour session of 10-Hz ICMS did not induce overt morphological activation of microglia but increased their process motility, directing extensions toward both the electrode and neurons exhibiting elevated calcium activity. By post-implantation Day 2, microglial extensions were significantly biased toward neurons whose ΔF/F surpassed a 3 standard deviation threshold after stimulation onset (74.26° ± 11.83°) but shifted away from those same neurons after 40 min of continuous stimulation (116.99° ± 9.19°) (p = 0.001732), suggesting a dynamic, homeostatic response to sustained neuronal calcium elevations. Although multi-day electrode insertion accelerated microglial motility and polarization toward the device, 10-Hz ICMS alone did not alter microglial branching or soma shape. Microglial contact frequency scaled with neuronal adaptation profiles: depressed neurons received the most contacts immediately post-implant (1.15 ± 0.3 contacts; p = .0460). These findings reveal stimulus-associated, neuron-dependent surveillance behaviors of microglia during early post-implantation ICMS and implicate them as active participants in short-term modulation of cortical circuits.

Indexed as

antidromic activationGliomodulationgliosynaptic transmissionimmunoelectrophysiologymicroglia-neuron crosstalkneural hysteresisneuroimmune feedbacktripartite synaptic modulation

Identifiers

PMID40661573
PMCPMC12259060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.