Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40661501›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

Synaptic vesicles that store monoamines and glutamate differ in protein composition.

Hrach Asmerian, Alexia J Diaz, Hongfei Xu, Juan A Oses-Prieto, Jacob Alberts, Anna Sanetra, Barathan Gnanabharathi, Noah Carr, Alma L Burlingame, Robert H Edwards and 1 more

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hrach Asmerian
Alexia J Diaz
Hongfei Xu
Juan A Oses-Prieto
Jacob Alberts
Anna Sanetra
Barathan Gnanabharathi
Noah Carr
Alma L Burlingame
Robert H Edwards
Kätlin Silm

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuromodulators such as the monoamines are known to differ from classical neurotransmitters like glutamate in the time scale of signaling due to activation of slower G protein-coupled receptors. Recent work has suggested that the mode of release also differs between classical and modulatory transmitters. Although many components of neurotransmitter release machinery have been identified, we still understand little about the mechanisms responsible for differences in release. In this study, we address the differences between release of dopamine and glutamate by comparing the composition of synaptic vesicles (SVs) that contain the vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2) versus vesicular glutamate transporter 2 (VGLUT2). Previous work has shown that these SV populations differ in frequency dependence, recycling kinetics and biogenesis. Taking advantage of a CRISPR-generated knock-in mouse with a cytoplasmic hemagglutinin (HA) tag at the N-terminus of VMAT2 to immunoisolate monoamine SVs, we find differences in the abundance and isoform expression of many SV protein families. Validation in primary neurons and in brain tissue confirms these differences in SV protein abundance between dopamine and glutamate release sites. Functional analysis reveals that the loss of differentially expressed SCAMP5 selectively impairs the recycling of VGLUT2 SVs, sparing VMAT2 vesicles in the same neuronal population. These findings provide new insights into the molecular diversity of SVs and the mechanisms that regulate the release of dopamine and glutamate, with implications for the physiological role of these transmitters and behavior.

Identifiers

PMID40661501
PMCPMC12258905

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.