Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40661499›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2025

A biochemical mechanism for Stu2/XMAP215-family microtubule polymerases.

Binnu Gangadharan, Daniel L Kober, Luke M Rice

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Binnu GangadharanDepartment of Biophysics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390.
Daniel L KoberDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390.ORCID 0000-0001-8657-9348
Luke M RiceDepartment of Biophysics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390.ORCID 0000-0001-6551-3307

Funding

CONFORMATION & RECOGNITION IN MICROTUBLE DYNAMICSR01GM098543 · NIGMS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI RICE, LUKE W · 2011 to 2023
$4.2M
Structural and Biochemical Mechanisms of Microtubule Dynamics and RegulationR35GM156385 · NIGMS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI Luke W Rice · 2025 to 2026
$1.3M
Structural and mechanistic basis for the maturation of site-one protease in the secretory pathwayR01GM155152 · NIGMS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI Daniel Luke Kober · 2024 to 2026
$1.0M
The mechanistic basis for targeted protein degradation in lipid metabolismR00GM141261 · NIGMS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI KOBER, DANIEL LUKE · 2023 to 2025
$747k
NIGMS NIH HHS R00 GM141261NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM098543NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM155152NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM156385
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Defining quantitative biochemical mechanisms of microtubule dynamics and regulation is a current challenge. Stu2/XMAP215-family polymerases use tubulin-binding TOG domains to catalyze microtubule growth, but how polymerase activity results from the number and tubulin-binding properties of TOGs is not understood. We tested whether an enzyme-like biochemical model for the unrelated actin polymerase Ena/VASP could be applied to quantitatively relate Stu2 microtubule polymerase activity to the number of its TOGs and the rate constants governing their interactions with tubulin. Stu2 activity displayed enzyme-like characteristics consistent with the biochemical model: Stu2 stimulated microtubule growth rates with hyperbolic dependence on tubulin concentration, and the amount of Stu2 on the microtubule end did not vary with tubulin concentration (microtubule growth rate). Complementary measurements of TOG:tubulin binding revealed high affinity (10 nM) and slow dissociation (0.03 s

Identifiers

PMID40661499
PMCPMC12259038

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.