Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40661321›Full record

ArticleBehavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology

Escalated begging does not compromise nestling health.

Daniel Parejo-Pulido, Tomás Redondo, Silvia Casquero, Lorenzo Pérez-Rodríguez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The Impairment of Body Condition Transiently Increases Oxidative Stress: A Dietary Restriction Experiment in Partridges.Journal of experimental zoology. Part A, Ecological and integrative physiology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Escalated begging does not compromise nestling health.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniel Parejo-PulidoInstituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos (IREC), CSIC-UCLM-JCCM, Ronda de Toledo 12, 13005 Ciudad Real, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7392-2423
Tomás RedondoEstación Biológica de Doñana (EBD), CSIC, Americo Vespucio 26, 41092 Sevilla, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0927-9111
Silvia CasqueroInstituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos (IREC), CSIC-UCLM-JCCM, Ronda de Toledo 12, 13005 Ciudad Real, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5466-7770
Lorenzo Pérez-RodríguezInstituto de Investigación en Recursos Cinegéticos (IREC), CSIC-UCLM-JCCM, Ronda de Toledo 12, 13005 Ciudad Real, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5926-1438

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A widely accepted explanation for the reliability of offspring begging signals assumes a differential benefit model balanced by direct viability costs independent of offspring nutritional condition. However, supporting evidence for this idea is inconclusive and often hampered by methodological limitations, including differential stimulation protocols and reliance on single, potentially biased markers of nestling health. This study tested the existence of direct, intrinsic, and condition-independent allocation trade-offs between begging and body mass, immunity and oxidative stress by manipulating the begging effort of spotless starling (

Indexed as

communicationcostly signalinggrowthimmunityoxidative stressparent-offspring conflict

Identifiers

PMID40661321
PMCPMC12257937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.