ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2025
Scalable automated reanalysis of genomic data in research and clinical rare disease cohorts.
Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Array-CGH to Whole-Genome Sequencing: A 29-Year Diagnostic Journey Culminating in the Identification of a De Novo ABCC9 Variant Consistent with Cantú Syndrome.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
37 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reanalysis of genomic data in rare disease is highly effective in increasing diagnostic yields but remains limited by manual approaches. Automation and optimization for high specificity will be necessary to ensure scalability, adoption and sustainability of iterative reanalysis. We developed a publicly available automated tool, Talos, and validated its performance using data from 1,089 individuals with rare genetic disease. Trio-based analysis identified 86% of known in-scope diagnoses, returning one variant per case on average. Variant burden reduced to one variant per 200 cases on iterative monthly reanalysis cycles. Application to an unselected cohort of 4,735 undiagnosed individuals identified 248 diagnoses (5.2% yield): 73 (29%) due to new gene-disease relationships, 56 (23%) due to new variant-level evidence, and 119 (48%) due to improved filtering and analysis strategies. Our automated, iterative reanalysis model, applied to thousands of rare disease patients, demonstrates the feasibility of delivering frequent, systematic reanalysis at scale.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.